BeautiCraft
A modpack of mods to beautify Minecraft and improve the soundscape.
!preview picture
This modpack, BeautiCraft, focuses on making Minecraft more beautiful and sonorous without changing the basic gameplay experience. It is packed with client-side improvements:
👀Visual enhancement: A large collection of mods and resource packs (incl. Fresh Animations, Physics Mod, Continuity, 3D models) for improved particles, animations, UI and textures for a more appealing look.
🎧Acoustic modifications: With mods such as AmbientSounds or Reactive Music, the soundscape becomes more diverse and immersive.
🛠Quality-of-Life: Includes minor adjustments to improve the user experience, such as the display of hunger/satiety values (AppleSkin), information about viewed entity (WTHIT), a zoom function (Zoomify) and a quick quit feature (FastQuit).
You can find which mods and resource packs are used in the version tab in the corresponding version.
The four shaders listed below are pre-installed in the modpack, and the FPS results reflect performance on my personal system:
| Shader Pack | Average FPS | 1% Low FPS |
|---|---|---|
| Complementary Shaders | 47.4 FPS | 36.2 FPS |
| BSL Shaders (default) | 65.7 FPS | 45.4 FPS |
| MakeUp - Ultra Fast | 122 FPS | 64.7 FPS |
| Vanilla | 432 FPS | 144.8 FPS |
complete fps test
Note: The FPS were slightly lower because the recording program and server were running on the same computer.camera movement was made with Typewriter plugin
Test system:
- GPU: NVIDIA RTX 3060
- CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- RAM: 16 GB
- Resolution: 2560×1440 (1440p)
- Minecraft Render Distance: 12 chunks
- Modpack version 3.1.0
This was a simple FPS test on my Minecraft server using a smooth camera fly-through to compare the performance of different shaders. It's not a full benchmark (e.g., no mobs, redstone, or heavy gameplay), but it gives a general idea of how well each shader performs in this environment.
